Both at the policy level and at the workplace level, the interests of labor are not always a unified set of interests versus employers with capital in the traditional “labour …
Both at the policy level and at the workplace level, the interests of labor are not always a unified set of interests versus employers with capital in the traditional “labour …
This case explains age discrimination in connection with compulsory retirement. Here, the claimant claimed that his mandatory retirement at age 65 was discriminatory. The Court decided that the claimant did …
This case is about age discrimination in connection with a new policy requiring employees to have a law degree before they receive a particular higher pay scale. It was noted …
The claimant was an employee of Cape Building Products Ltd at a site which manufactured asbestos boards. During the course of his work, the claimant was exposed to asbestos dust …
In this landmark U.K. appellate case, twenty “valeters” for Autoclenz, a provider of car-cleaning services to motor retailers and auctioneers, filed a claim with the U.K.’s Employment Tribunal (“ET”), arguing …
NCPs involved: Switzerland NCP, United Kingdom NCP, Germany NCP, France NCP COUNTRY OF OPERATIONS: Uzbekistan DATE: October-December 2010 STATUS: All Agreement/Concluded ISSUE: The complaint alleges that cotton dealers in France, …
This is the Act governing UK law that aims to prevent inequality as well as discrimination and harassment concerning personal characteristics/sex/pay/victimization against employees at the workforce. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15
This case is about pay differences based on sex and the possibility of discrimination. Here, the claimants worked as carers for special needs children and claimed that male …
This case concerns the connection between religious beliefs and discrimination based on sexual orientation. Here, the claimant refused to officiate civil partnership based on her religious beliefs. The Court decided …
This case explains discrimination with respect to philosophical beliefs held by employees. The Court held an employee’s philosophical beliefs are protected – and therefore are a belief – provided …
International Lawyers Assisting Workers Network
c/o Solidarity Center
1130 Connecticut Ave, NW 8th Floor
Washington DC, 20036